With any luck, the days when SEO experts could manipulate search engine rankings will soon be history.
If you’re a local business person, you probably know how difficult it is to get good ranking for your most important keywords. Even if you focus your site on a local keyword like Leisure World homes for sale or Vancouver Real Estate you’re in for a battle.
That’s because search engine optimization (SEO) experts set up bogus re-direct sites that are in direct competition with yours for rankings. The purpose of these sites is to capture search engine rankings (and therefore search engine traffic) so they can send that traffic to pay per click ads or other money-making websites. The owners of these websites have no interest in actually providing services or original information about the markets they pretend to serve.
The little guy – like a local real estate agent, for example – doesn’t stand much of a chance against these “experts”. They usually own a large nest of sites where they can plant links that boost the rankings of their money-making redirect sites.
As I’ve said many times before, the blame for skewing search traffic like this has to be laid directly at the feet of the search engines themselves – especially Google – who makes tons of money from pay per click advertising that runs on these re-direct sites. They have always talked a good game when it comes to criticizing link farms, purchased links, etc. But have usually turned around and rewarded the practitioners of these techniques with rankings that resulted in healthy advertising returns.
Changes at Google
According to some observers Google is finally doing something about this. For example, see this blog post (and video) that discusses some of some of the changes coming to how Google ranks sites.
The big changes coming in the near future have to do with the importance of targeted traffic, the use of rich content such as video, and the gradual introduction of personalized search results based on user patterns and interests.
I’ve been doing SEO for a few years and concluded about two years ago that chasing after rankings using old-fashioned link building techniques is a mug’s game.
Instead, it gradually became obvious to me that the content of specific web pages should be what determines their position in the search engine pecking order. Not only did I consider it a bit dishonest to try building links the old-fashioned way, but I felt it was inevitable that the major search engines would eventually figure out better ways of ranking sites.
Right from the beginning the original developers of Google certainly agreed that “content is king”. But unfortunately they cashed this idea out in terms of inbound links. They assumed that a page about, say “dog training”, with many inbound dog training references (links) from other web sites is an important “dog training” resource, and deserves to be ranked higher when people search for “dog training”.
But as we all know, links can be manipulated. In the not so distant past an enterprising link building specialist could build a network of sites – especially blogs – and fill them with links to other sites they wanted to give a boost in the rankings.
For the most part it didn’t matter whether anybody ever looked at those sites, or whether actual traffic ever came from them.
Traffic a much better indicator
Of course search engine experts always claimed that the ultimate reason for link building was to generate traffic. But the focus for the last six or seven years has been on manipulating search engine rankings to generate traffic from search engines. Whether traffic came from the actual links on the linking sites was of secondary importance.
Getting traffic from the search engines has always been the rationale for spending time, energy and money on search engine optimization.
Having been involved in this game for a few years I find it interesting how many website owners now just take it for granted that search engines should be their primary source of traffic.
For instance, I occasionally suggest to a client that a better way to generate higher quality targeted traffic is to develop a client and prospect list and do regular emails to the list. The email messages can be used to drive traffic to an article, squeeze page or blog post. But often enough the response I get makes me wonder if I am talking Chinese.
Whether website owners understand it or not, many experts (myself included) think this is the way Google must go in the immediate future. As time goes by Google will be giving more and more credit to sites that already have targeted traffic and use interactive components that demonstrate visitor involvement. Things such as video content and blogs – both of which do a good job of tracking views and reader comments.
- More Posts
- SpyWare Detection & Removal Software!
Our intelligent technical team searches every cyber nook and cranny 24/7 to hunt out and locate any new spyware and adware files that have...


SEO is About to Change – Thank Goodness! – Local Business Marketing- TheeWay Information 9:39 pm on July 11, 2009 Permalink
[...] posted here: SEO is About to Change – Thank Goodness! – Local Business Marketing Tags: adsense, bogus-re-direct, business, experts-set, Internet, pay-per, search-engine You [...]
Andy 2:36 pm on July 12, 2009 Permalink
So now that Google is changing thier minds on how they rank local sites it should be time for
local business owners to take thier head out of the sand and pay attention to thier website.
Never updating and no interaction just won’t do it.
Dennis Yu 2:43 pm on July 12, 2009 Permalink
Rick,
Solid points– most of us know about Google Map spam and jamming fake results into searches. The engines have publicly stated that they are relying more on offline proof– actual directory listings and verifications to determine local legitimacy. Trust is more important, measured by links from trusted domains and pagerank, to some extent. You should consider tools like SEOmoz Pro if you haven’t already, to monitor trust being passed by inbound links to your sites. For example, rickhendershot.com has toolbar PR0, but could be a PR3 or PR4 from a PR5 inbound link.
Love to hear more about what you’re doing in the local space!
Rick 3:21 pm on July 14, 2009 Permalink
@Dennis Yu – Thanks for the comment Dennis. For the type of customers I have in mind – dealing with a strictly local clientele – I tend to think SEO is not the answer to the traffic question. About the same time I came to that conclusion I also stopped thinking that PR is important. Of course I could be wrong about this, but I think the importance of social networking is that it is pushing web marketers back to more old-fashioned techniques that require people-to-people interaction, rather than relying on an all-powerful intermediary like Google.
Rick 3:26 pm on July 14, 2009 Permalink
@Andy – I couldn’t agree more. The problem now is that having a single site is probably not enough. Even the interaction you can generate with a blog is being made somewhat passe with the onslaught of Twitter and other more interaction-based social sites. I think to be successful a local web marketer now has to operate on various levels (website, blog, twitter, facebook, youtube, etc.) with interaction between them. Can a business trying to make a splash online really afford not to have a blog, a twitter account, etc.? I don’t think so.
Juhani Tontti 9:50 am on July 24, 2009 Permalink
Well, when Google saw backlinks as votes from other sites to yours, that was an indicator, how useful your site was. And people built lots of backlinks. I doubt, that whatever the ranking reason will be, marketers will invent systems to manipulate that.
Rick 10:09 am on July 24, 2009 Permalink
@Juhani Tontii – Yes, I agree, marketers will try to manipulate whatever ranking system is used. But if Google weighted their criteria differently and gave more weight to such things as real traffic it would be much more difficult to manipulate.
In any case, Google will become less and less important as social media such as Twitter, Facebook, etc. become the dominant way people share information. They are doing an end run around Google – providing direct traffic from real users rather than indirect traffic filtered through Google’s search criteria. Marketers have become so used to the SEO approach to traffic generation that they find it difficult to get past that way of looking at the issue.
Kaya Singer 6:31 pm on July 28, 2009 Permalink
Great article. I’ve felt like a broken record advising my clients to focus on their content because this is what keeps a potential client on your site longer and involved with your business – you offer value to them. So your words about SEO feel like a wonderful reinforcement of what I’ve been teaching all along. And your content needs to reflect your business/marketing plan. Mind if I use part of your article for my blog? awakeningbusiness.com/blog
Rick 7:09 pm on July 28, 2009 Permalink
@ Kaya – Hi Kaya, thanks for stopping by and leaving a comment. Yes, of course you can use whatever part of the article you want. Let me know and I’ll tweet your post.
web and rank 8:42 pm on August 3, 2009 Permalink
I agree but if the video is a bad quality and also the visitor is bad that will be a bad factor for the Google algorithms and computation technology to gives you back exactly what you want.